All Posts Tagged With: "strategic planning"

10 Insights into Strategic Planning

Joan Magretta wrote a guide to strategy guru Michael Porter’s work called Understanding Michael Porter. As she worked on the book, she kept a list of insights, including “that most companies think they have a strategy when they don’t,” as she noted in an article on HBR.

Here are her ten insights and how they relate to the Baldrige model:

  1. You gain a competitive advantage by creating unique value for customers. Customer-driven excellence is a Baldrige core value, defined as an organization’s performance and quality being judged by its customers. If customers rate your performance and quality high, you will gain a competitive advantage.
  2. Your strategy must also clarify what the organization will not do. The Baldrige model asks several questions about how you develop strategies that will help you prioritize your strategies.
  3. “Competition is about profits, not market share,” writes Magretta. You grow a company by increasing profits, not market share.
  4. Brilliant strategies will not lead to performance excellence unless you execute them. The Baldrige Criteria devote an entire section to strategy implementation.
  5. Good strategies are interconnected and build on core competencies. The Baldrige Criteria ask how your strategic objectives capitalize on your core competencies and balance short- and longer-term challenges and opportunities.
  6. While it’s important to be flexible,…
12Jan2012 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

Still Passionate about Baldrige

“There is no question that our adherence to the Baldrige performance criteria has made us a much more efficient university, and helped us weather repeated cuts in state aid without affecting educational quality,” write Charles W. Sorensen and Julie Furst-Bowe, chancellor and provost at the University of Wisconsin-Stout (article here).

UW-Stout earned the Baldrige Award in 2001. Ten years later it remains passionate about the value of integrating Baldrige. According to Sorenson and Furst-Bowe, “The most important change brought about by our Baldrige experience, which is now part of our culture, was the establishment of an inclusive planning process to ensure that, in Baldrige speak, ‘all arrows are pointing in the same direction,’ and not at cross-purposes.”

Having worked with five Baldrige Award winners, I can attest to the value of aligning processes and people with the goals, strategies, and objectives of the organization. Whether you are in business, healthcare, or education, the ability to focus all activities on shared goals dramatically improves performance and is a major reason Baldrige Award winners achieve world-class results.

Sorenson and Furst-Bowe also state that “the Baldrige model…also led to a number of important innovations, including our e-Scholar or student laptop program, our designation as Wisconsin’s polytechnic…

3Jan2012 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

Creating a Customer Culture

It’s always refreshing to hear a company that excels at serving customers describe its approach, especially when that company is in an industry that generally treats its customers like cattle.

Hawaiian Airlines has ranked among the leaders in customer service for years and is routinely ranked first by the US Department of Transportation for on-time performance and fewest cancellations. Charles Nardello oversees aircraft, flight, and customer service operations at Hawaiian Airlines. In a recent article on the HBR Blog Network, he discusses how the airline improved operational performance while maintaining service excellence, citing three things a company must do well “to maintain an unbeatable level of operational excellence: (1) Get very close to their customer; (2) Benchmark against itself on a consistent basis; and, (3) Empower employees to address the unexpected.”

A customer focus permeates Hawaiian Airlines. “For every decision we make, from the most basic to the complex, the customer always comes first—they are the driver of our decision-making and strategic planning,” writes Nardello. A culture that brings the customer perspective to every decision acts far differently than a company where customers are an afterthought or are only considered when addressing customer issues.

Hawaiian Airlines has an independent agency survey customers every month…

14Nov2011 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

Which Comes First: Facts or Opinions?

The Baldrige model supports fact-based decisions. Management by fact is one of 11 Baldrige core values. One of the seven categories in the Baldrige Criteria focuses on measurement and analysis. Measurement—“how do you know?”—is woven into questions throughout the other five “process” categories, and the results of your key measures are reported in the seventh category.

Here’s what management guru Peter Drucker wrote on the topic: “Executives who make effective decisions know that one does not start with facts. One starts with opinions.”

I disagree.

According to Drucker, which Stephen Wunker addresses in his post on the HBR Blog Network here, if leaders do not make their opinions clear, they will simply find the facts that confirm what they believe. The problem is that the opinions and the confirmatory facts push the organization in one direction without considering other courses of action. Wunker writes, “Decision makers may have a general sense of stakeholders’ opinions, but in their eagerness to act and to avoid controversy they do not probe to understand these perspectives fully. Rather, they quickly make a decision and then marshal facts to support it.”

In the Baldrige model, the process of understanding opinions and perspectives fully would be part of the strategy…

7Nov2011 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

How Well Do You Leverage Metrics?

One of the strengths of Baldrige Award winners is alignment. Strategies and goals are aligned with the organization’s mission and vision. Action plans are aligned with strategies and goals. The performance measurement and performance management systems are aligned with strategies, goals, and action plans. As a result, everyone in the organization is contributing to achieving the organization’s mission and vision. On every project. Every day.

Alignment ChartThe power of alignment can be seen in the results Baldrige Award winners deliver, a sampling of which you can review here. These organizations prove that alignment is critical to performance excellence.

A recent study by IndustryWeek and MESA International showed the frequent disconnect between objectives and metrics throughout manufacturing companies. The chart shows that only about a third of respondents believe their objectives and metrics are well or very well aligned across their companies. In which category would your organization fall?

One of the interesting results of the survey was the discrepancy among positions of those who “always” leverage metrics to improve performance: 28% of senior leaders said they did, 35% of department heads, and 50% of team leaders or supervisors. At the “staff” level, 40% claimed they always leveraged metrics. IndustryWeek tried to explain the low figure for senior…

31Oct2011 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

Strategic Human Resources

Fast Company blogger Seth Kahan recently led a roundtable discussion among senior HR professionals about three tough questions they face (article here):

  • How does strategic HR drive competitive excellence?
  • What skills does HR need to develop to contribute in the C-suite?
  • How is talent acquired to build the future, to achieve the organization’s strategic objectives?

The conversation produced these insights:

  • HR is positioned to drive competitive excellence if it is fully aligned with business goals. The Baldrige Criteria ask a key question about this: What are your key human resource or workforce plans to accomplish your short- and longer-term strategic objectives and action plans?
  • Organizational capacity building is a direct and powerful contribution HR can make if it is fully aligned with the future direction of the enterprise. In addition to the question above, the Baldrige Criteria ask: How do you organize and manage your workforce to address your strategic challenges and action plans?
  • Senior HR professionals must be well-versed in business drivers including financials, industry, market circumstances, and competitive intelligence to be considered a player in the C-suite.
  • As the world transitions from hierarchical leadership to self-organizing collaboration, HR is positioned to support or drive this shift. The HR section of the Baldrige Criteria addresses this shift by…
29Jun2011 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

7 Rules for an Effective SWOT Analysis

The Baldrige Criteria ask how, as part of your strategic planning process, you collect and analyze relevant data and information pertaining to your organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT).

Strengths and weaknesses are internal factors; opportunities and threats are external factors. A post on RapidBI describes the characteristics of each:

  • Strengths are positive tangible and intangible attributes, internal to your organization, that are within its control.
  • Weaknesses are factors within your control that detract from your ability to attain your goal, but that you could improve performance on.
  • Opportunities represent the reason for your organization to exist and develop; identify them by time frames.
  • Threats are beyond your organization’s control, which could place your mission or operation at risk. Classify them by their seriousness and probability of occurrence and develop contingency plans to address them if they occur.

RapidBI describes two acronyms for identifying the factors to address in your SWOT analysis:

  • PRIMO-F for strengths and weaknesses: People, Resources, Innovation/Ideas, Marketing, Operations, and Finance
  • PESTLE for opportunities and threats: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental

The post offers simple rules for a successful SWOT analysis:

  1. Be realistic about the strengths and weaknesses of your organization
  2. Distinguish between where your organization is today and where it could be in the future
  3. Be…
18May2011 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued