All Posts Tagged With: "process improvement"
What Differentiates Baldrige Award Winners (Part 3)
In the first two articles in this series, I described five of the seven characteristics of organizations with sound management systems: (1) they think process; (2) they act on data; (3) they know where they’re going; (4) they align activities; and, (5) they blur boundaries. They exemplify all 11 Baldrige core values but one stands out: They have a systems perspective, which, according to the Baldrige Criteria, “means managing your whole organization, as well as its components, to achieve success.”
They also share these final two characteristics:
6. They treat people well. That means everyone the company touches: employees, customers, suppliers, community members—everyone. The striking difference between companies that treat people as commodities and companies that treat them well was captured in the transformation of Wainwright Industries. In the early 1990s, the leaders of this small Missouri-based manufacturer of machined parts listened to a speaker describe how his company thrived because of a sincere trust and belief in people. One of Wainwright’s leaders wondered what that meant. The CEO didn’t have a good answer, and that bothered him. What would Wainwright look like if it sincerely trusted and believed in its people?
The answer changed the company. A sincere trust and belief in people became one of its core values, and that value guided its actions. Quality improved. Safety improved. Customer satisfaction improved. Gross profit jumped 62 percent in just three years. And employees rewarded the company’s trust by generating more than one implemented improvement suggestion per employee per week. Most American companies struggle…
28Jul2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedChanging County Processes
What happens when a new county executive initiates radical change? Exactly what you would expect.
Jeffrey Smith came to Santa Clara County to help close a $230 million deficit. He implemented hoshin kanri (policy deployment), which some moronic union official described as “some airy-fairy thing.” Many of the people responsible for doing the planning ignored him and a number of department heads submitted budgets the old way, according to a story on MercuryNews.com (“Santa Clara County new executive’s strategy has fans, skeptics,” Julia Prodis Sulek, May 14, 2010).
Smith has taken a county hospital from the threat of losing $300 million in funding because of a pattern of violence to a national award for patient safety. He’s a former doctor, lawyer, and hospital administrator and he understands that the same old, same old just won’t work anymore.
“We can no longer rely on old processes and procedures,” he says. “My job is to enable the organization to make the dramatic changes, which will be difficult.”
Hoshin kanri, popularized by Toyota, helps an organization focus on a shared vision and goals and involves people in developing strategic and action plans to achieve those goals. I worked with Zytec in 1991 when it won the Baldrige Award and one of the reasons it won was its robust hoshin kanri process.
One of Smith’s responsibilities is the county’s Valley Medical Center, which faces budget problems. Seven of the county’s eight clinics are not accepting new patients because they are overloaded. Smith wants to help people solve the problems that…
25May2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedAsk What, Not Who
Several years ago I did a Baldrige assessment for a well-known service company. It was quickly apparent that a siege mentality permeated its offices with leadership blaming the production facility for problems and production blaming leadership and everybody blaming the customers, who generally disliked the company. When I presented my evaluation of the company’s management system, I told leaders they had a “culture of blameology.”
The most common question in response to any problem was, “Whose fault is it?” As a result, people kept their heads down. Nobody took initiative. Everybody avoided responsibility. Unhappy and unmotivated employees spent more time looking over their shoulders than focusing on what was in front of them.
So the first task was to change the question. Instead of asking whose fault a problem was, the more effective question is, “What’s the process?” W. Edwards Deming and Joseph Juran liked to point out that 80 to 90 to 95 percent of an organization’s problems are problems with the system, not with the people working in the system, so if you really have to blame someone, blame the people responsible for the system. Blame leadership. That won’t solve the problems but at least you’ll be holding the right people accountable.
You solve problems by understanding and improving the processes that produce them. This is a process issue, not a people issue. As someone once said, if you put a good performer up against a bad system, the system will win every time.
The Baldrige Criteria ask questions that reveal a…
6May2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedGet Your Free Report Today!
This is how seven recent Baldrige Award Winners design, manage, and improve their processes:
- Process design or redesign includes clearly identifying customer requirements, piloting or testing to make sure the process works as planned, training or retraining for those involved in the process, and identifying key process performance measures.
- Process measurement is vital to process management and improvement.
- A person or group is responsible for every key process.
- Everyone needs to be involved in process improvement.
- Process improvement must be managed.
- Best-practice process improvements are identified and shared.
To read how each organization does this, sign up for the free report in the orange box on the right. You will receive the free report, and then you will get an email with a second free report on performance management. You will receive three emails over the next three weeks that talk about information on Baldrige.com that you may not be aware of—all of which is free. Finally, you will receive email occasionally to alert you to special features on Baldrige.com, such as the next free report. Everything is free. I won’t bug you with a lot of email. I won’t share your email address with anyone (see our Privacy Policy). And you can opt out easily if you change your mind.
When you sign up, you will receive an email to confirm your subscription (and to make sure nobody else is using your email address). Click on the link to get your free report.
Get your free report today!
…
2Apr2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedFind Your Bright Spots
I’ve been reading Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard by Chip and Dan Heath. It’s well-researched, well-written, and thought-provoking, and I highly recommend it.
One of the brothers’ recommendations is to pursue the bright spots in your organization. In an interview in McKinsey Quarterly (March 2010), Chip Heath says, “The principle of bright spots is that you shouldn’t try to be more like Apple; you should try to be more like yourself at your best moments.” As the Heaths write in their book, figure out “what’s working and how can we do more of it.”
The Baldrige Criteria address this by asking how you manage organizational knowledge to accomplish the rapid identification, sharing, and implementation of best practices. To many organizations, identifying best practices means benchmarking. Chip Heath is not a big fan of benchmarking. In the interview, he says, “If you believe that organizations differ in their cultures, capabilities, and structures, there’s something fundamentally odd about saying that you want to be more like another company that has a very different culture, structure, and set of capabilities.”
While most formal benchmarking processes try to address these differences, a lot of time can be wasted trying to fit someone else’s best practice to the way your organization operates. Your own bright spots should be easier to replicate because you already know they work in your culture and structure. The Heaths offer suggestions on how to recognize and understand your bright spots in their book.
Part of the problem is that we seek problems.…
16Mar2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedWe Are All Idiots
I first saw poka-yoke in action when I helped Zytec with its Baldrige Award-winning application in 1991. The company had adopted Japanese quality improvement approaches, including hoshin planning, to create robust processes for manufacturing power supplies.
Poka-yoke is Japanese for “avoid mistakes.” In “Poka-Yoke is Not a Joke” (Harvard Business Review, February 4, 2010), Michael Schrage tells the story of how Shigeo Shingo introduced his idea to Toyota assembly line workers, describing his clever techniques to make production processes “idiot-proof”:
“One of the plant’s employees burst into tears,” Schrage writes. “‘I am not an idiot!’ she cried. A stricken Shingo quickly recanted. He scrapped ‘idiot-proof’ in favor of declaring his initiatives essential to making assembly lines ‘mistake-proof.’”
The spell checkers in document creation software, from word processing to email creation to filling out online forms, “mistake-proof” your writing. They are poka-yoke devices that have saved us all from embarrassment. New luxury cars use technology to stop the car if the driver falls asleep or isn’t paying attention to how close the car in front is getting. That’s poka-yoke. Hospital employees draw an “X” on an arm or leg on which surgery will be performed. Poka-yoke.
Poka-yoke works because we are all idiots, especially when it comes to tasks we repeat so often that we stop paying attention to how we do them. Like writing. Or driving. Or operating, if you’re a surgeon.
In the Process Management category of the Baldrige Criteria, you are asked how you prevent defects, service errors, and rework. Poka-yoke is one way…
5Feb2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedProcess Management Review
I realize there’s a lot of stuff on this site that may obscure what you’re looking for. If you want to read about process design, management, and improvement, these articles will interest you. Just click on the name of the article to go to it.
- 10 Critical Questions: Process Management. Questions you can ask to evaluate your work system and how you design, manage, and improve your key work processes.
- Identifying Key Work Processes. Where to look for your key processes.
- 3 Steps to Finding Your Key Processes. Questions you can ask to determine your most important internal value creation processes.
- The Process Matrix. A good way to identify your key work processes, requirements, and performance measures—and to see what’s missing.
- 5 Powerful Process Questions. How Brevard Public Schools create a system of process management and continuous improvement.
- The Power of Process. Cargill Corn Milling’s Best Practices Model.
- Process Management: DMAIC for Everyone. You can use the DMAIC process to identify, analyze, and solve process issues.
- My Personal Baldrige: Process. Steps you can take to apply process thinking to your job.
Process thinking and a systems perspective are key characteristics of Baldrige Award recipients. If you know what your key processes are and systematically improve them, your management will deliver a competitive advantage.
4Jan2010 | Steve George | 2 comments | Continued
