All Posts Tagged With: "Poudre Valley Health System"

Understanding Employee Requirements

When asked to identify their key stakeholders, Baldrige Award winners include employees on the list. In 1997, 2008 Baldrige Award recipient Poudre Valley Health System surveyed its employees and asked:

  1. What makes you want to jump out of bed and come to work?
  2. How do we build a culture that supports that?

Two years later, PVHS collaborated with Colorado State University to identify key staff requirements, which became the framework for its semiannual Employee Culture Survey. The requirements are:

  • Teamwork and cooperation
  • Safety in innovating
  • Listening to each other
  • Respect and fairness
  • Enthusiasm
  • Feedback and accountability
  • Resources and participation

It’s hard to find anything unusual about this list. What is unusual is the systematic approach PVHS used to identify these requirements and how it has continued to refine the list–and what it means–ever since.

As with customer requirements, it’s easy to assume you know what is required to engage and satisfy your employees. Such assumptions are dangerous. PVHS knows what its employees require and it acts on that knowledge to improve both engagement and satisfaction.

Workforce engagement is a PVHS core competency and is measured on its semiannual survey. In 2007, PVHS was as good as or better than the top 10% nationwide in four survey questions on engagement and in the top 10% on 11 of 16 attitude areas.

Based on results, it’s clear PVHS knows what its employees want.

To find out more about Poudre Valley Health System, read its award application summary.

To read more about employee engagement, click on these articles:

4Nov2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

Why Health Care Needs Baldrige

There are at least two reasons health care organizations account for roughly half of all Baldrige Award applications: Health care in the U.S. is expensive and the quality is poor. Health care organizations that recognize the need to lower their costs while improving quality see the Baldrige model as a systemic tool for accomplishing both.

The scope of the problem is brilliantly described in two 10-part series by Aaron Carroll on The Incidental Economist.

In the first series, “What makes the US health care system so expensive,” Carroll makes the point that, indeed, health care in the United States is very expensive when compared to the 30 countries in the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Those 30 countries are bunched together between spending 6 and 11% of their Gross Domestic Product on health care. The one outlier, at 16%, is the United States.

Some argue that we should be spending more on health care. Carroll agrees:

“We are richer, and it is appropriate that we therefore spend more. We would expect to get better outcomes for that extra spending, which would also be appropriate. But as you can see [in Figure 1—click on “continued” at the end of this article to view it], every other country lines up on an almost straight line. There is a very stable relationship between how much money a country has in terms of GDP per capita, and how much it spends on health care.”

Thirty countries line up along the line. The U.S. doesn’t. One could easily argue that the…

2Nov2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

Aligning Individual Performance with Your Mission and Vision

In most organizations, the mission and vision have little to do with what gets done day-to-day. Even if employees know what the mission and vision are—and very few do—they fail to see how their work contributes to achieving them. Instead, departments, teams, and individuals focus on different things, on what the boss tells them is important or the company decides to target that year or the latest problem needing to be fixed. Rather than pulling together toward shared goals, they are pulled apart by shifting priorities and diverging objectives.

One of the distinguishing characteristics of Baldrige Award recipients is how well they align people, plans, and processes with the mission and vision of the organization. Every department, team, and individual not only knows what the mission and vision are, but they also understand what they must do to support them. The connection between an employee’s work and the mission and vision of his/her organization is documented and measurable.

Poudre Valley Health System, which won the Baldrige Award in 2008, calls this its “Global Path to Success.” Like other Award recipients, it uses its strategic plan and balanced scorecard to cascade its vision, mission, values, and strategic objectives throughout the organization, as shown in its award application summary:

PVHS Alignment Diagram

According to PVHS, the Global Path to Success “provides a leadership system and framework for this culture, incorporating: (1) the performance management system, which links individual goals to organizational goals through each employee’s personal goal card; and (2) the Code of Conduct, Behavior Standards, and Leadership…

23Dec2009 | Steve George | 2 comments | Continued

Creating a Balanced Scorecard

Performance measurement improved significantly with the advent of the balanced scorecard. Before that, no matter what an organization did, it tended to emphasize one set of measures at the expense of all others. Businesses focused on financial performance. Schools targeted test scores. Government concentrated on…I have no idea.

Each set of measures was important but just part of a bigger picture, and each a lagging indicator of performance on all of the processes that produced these results.

The balanced scorecard directs leaders’ attention to how their organization operates, and how it operates determines how it will perform. A scorecard is also a powerful tool for aligning the activities of an organization with its vision, mission, goals, and objectives. Most Baldrige Award winners rely on balanced scorecards, along with their strategic plans, to focus everyone on what the organization must do to succeed.

I recently sat in on a Webinar by Stacey Barr, a performance measurement expert, in which someone asked a basic question about how you figure out what to measure. The Baldrige Criteria put it this way: How do you select data and information for tracking daily operations and overall organizational performance?

Barr suggested asking a different question. Rather than thinking about how to measure something, start with your goals and objectives. Make sure they clearly convey what you wish to achieve. Consider words you would use to describe meeting the goals and objectives such as effective, efficient, reliable, quality, engaged, systematic, and sustainable. What does it look like when the goal or…

14Dec2009 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

2008 Baldrige Awards Presented Today

Three organizations will receive their Baldrige Awards from Vice President Joe Biden today in a ceremony in Washington, D.C. I attended such a ceremony about ten years ago as a guest of Custom Research, at which President Clinton handed out the Awards, and they are exciting events for the winning organizations.

The 2008 Baldrige Award recipients are:

  • Poudre Valley Health System, a not-for-profit health care organization with a service area of 50,000 square miles in northern Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming. PVHS has some of the highest clinical outcomes in the country for mortality rates, complication, and infection rates, and patient satisfaction and financial performance well within the top 10% of all organizations nationally.
  • Iredell-Statesville Schools, a K-12 public school system serving nearly 21,000 students in southwestern North Carolina. Its per-pupil operations expenditures are among the lowest in the state at the same time that it is ranked academically in the state’s top 10 school systems.
  • Cargill Corn Milling North America, a business unit of Cargill Inc. that manufactures corn- and sugar-based food in nine manufacturing facilities throughout the U.S. CCM’s earnings after tax nearly tripled from 2003 to 2007. From 2006 to 2008, CCM saved more than $15 million from ideas generated by employees.

You can learn more about these Baldrige Award recipients and the winners in previous years at the Baldrige program’s Web site here.

To find out more about the 2008 winners, read:

2Dec2009 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

KEYSTONE: Customer Knowledge

An organization exists to serve customers whether they are called customers, clients, patients, students, constituents, or another name given to people who come to you for your products or services. A key measure of your success is how well you meet your customers’ requirements: Meet or exceed them and you improve satisfaction and loyalty with the benefits these provide; fail to meet their requirements and you lose customers, revenue, or support.

The first order of business, then, is to make sure you know exactly what your customers require. Most organizations don’t. They think they know. After all, they interact with customers every day. They may even be able to produce a list of customer requirements, which should really be called a list of assumptions about customer requirements because few organizations take a systematic approach to identifying, validating, and communicating key customer requirements.

I once worked with a manufacturer that was the worldwide leader in its industry. After completing its award application, I was asked to share my feedback on the application with the senior leadership team. My first bullet said: You do not have rock-solid understanding of customer requirements.

Boy, did they lay into me! “We’re the market leader,” one said, “of course we know what our customers want.” “We have thousands of customer contacts every day,” said another, “and we capture and share information about them daily.” When the initial backlash died down I explained that they did not have any processes for identifying the requirements of their customer groups, validating those requirements, and…

22Oct2009 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued