Healthcare
For Hospitals, Culture Matters Most
According to a recent study, the number one factor that distinguishes top-performing hospitals from bottom-performing hospitals when it comes to mortality rates for heart attacks is organizational culture.
Not the size of the hospital. Not “superstar” physicians. Not electronic medical records systems.
Culture.
The study, published in The Annals of Internal Medicine (abstract here), involved 11 hospitals that ranked either in the top 5% or bottom 5% in mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The researchers conducted more than 150 in-depth interviews with leaders and staff at these hospitals, then correlated hospital performance data with themes from the interviews. The researchers concluded that “hospitals in the high-performing and low-performing groups differed substantially in the domains of organizational values and goals, senior management involvement, broad staff presence and expertise in AMI care, communication and coordination among groups, and problem solving and learning. Participants described diverse protocols or processes for AMI care (such as rapid response teams, clinical guidelines, use of hospitalists, and medication reconciliation); however, these did not systematically differentiate high-performing from low-performing hospitals.”
In other words, the difference between high- and low-performing hospitals is the quality of leadership, not the quality of physicians, technology, or equipment.
One of most effective ways to develop a cohesive vision and build a successful culture is by integrating the Baldrige model. Take a moment to read the profiles of hospitals that have won the Baldrige Award and you will be struck by the strength of their cultures:
- Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital has 99% of its heart failure patients complying with their…
Diagnosing for Excellence
In healthcare, you never treat before you diagnose. The doctor never walks in and says, “I’m scheduling you for surgery on your knee, now tell me why you’re here.” Yet many organizations do just that when it comes to treating their performance: “We know we have problems so we’ll implement Six Sigma and see if that works.” It’s a prescription for sustained mediocrity.
In a webinar on Friday, Katie Owens, Baptist Leadership Group’s director of research and performance improvement, described a more logical approach her consulting organization calls “Diagnosing for Excellence.” It starts with a comprehensive inquiry into how a healthcare organization operates with the goal of creating a roadmap to achieve patient-centered excellence. Katie identified five steps in this process:
- Define accountability for patient-centered excellence
- Diagnose performance gaps
- Develop the skills of leaders and staff
- Execute best practices in sequence and customize to outcomes
- Evaluate your results and make sure the improvements stick
The Baptist Leadership Group is part of Baptist Health Care, as is Baptist Hospital, which won the Baldrige Award in 2003. The Group understands the value of a comprehensive assessment from Baptist’s experience with the Baldrige process. It also uses Baptist Hospital as a “living laboratory” to test and prove the tools, tactics, and best practices that it offers its clients.
You can find out more about Baptist Leadership Group by clicking here.
To read more about best practices in healthcare, click on these articles:
- Why Health Care Needs Baldrige
- A Baldrige Award Winner’s Health Pyramid
- AtlantiCare’s Baldrige Journey
- 10 Healthcare Innovations
- Baldrige Saves Lives
- Why Baldrige? Saint Luke’s Makes the…
A Baldrige Award Winner’s Health Pyramid
The Baldrige model values a systems perspective. One of the most impressive system perspectives I’ve seen was shared by Heartland Health, a 2009 Baldrige Award winner, in its award application summary. It’s called the Health Pyramid.

There’s a lot going on in this diagram and it all relates to how Heartland Health (HH) serves the health care needs of its communities.
The “tip of the iceberg” shows the diseases that most healthcare organization in the U.S. spend all of their time and money treating. HH provides this care through the Heartland Regional Medical Center (HRMC), a 353-bed tertiary care hospital, and Heartland Clinic (HC), a group of 107 physicians.
The causes of death from these diseases, human behaviors such as tobacco use, poor diet, and inactivity, are less visible but more important to actually preventing disease. HH promotes health and provides disease management and insurance to individuals and companies that need coverage through its Community Health Improvement Services (CHIS) and through HRMC, HC, and the Heartland Foundation (HF).
The drivers of these behavioral choices are the root causes of poor health. According to HH’s application, the Heartland Foundation “empowers youth, adults, and organizations to build better, healthier, and more livable communities and does so by creating dialogue, funding innovative collaboratives, and sponsoring initiatives promoting and enhancing the community.”
All three levels of the Health Pyramid support Heartland Health’s Vision, which is shown in the top left corner with key words—best, safest, healthy, and productive—aligned with the levels. Each level also aligns with a Heartland Health…
16Nov2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedWhy Health Care Needs Baldrige
There are at least two reasons health care organizations account for roughly half of all Baldrige Award applications: Health care in the U.S. is expensive and the quality is poor. Health care organizations that recognize the need to lower their costs while improving quality see the Baldrige model as a systemic tool for accomplishing both.
The scope of the problem is brilliantly described in two 10-part series by Aaron Carroll on The Incidental Economist.
In the first series, “What makes the US health care system so expensive,” Carroll makes the point that, indeed, health care in the United States is very expensive when compared to the 30 countries in the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Those 30 countries are bunched together between spending 6 and 11% of their Gross Domestic Product on health care. The one outlier, at 16%, is the United States.
Some argue that we should be spending more on health care. Carroll agrees:
“We are richer, and it is appropriate that we therefore spend more. We would expect to get better outcomes for that extra spending, which would also be appropriate. But as you can see [in Figure 1—click on “continued” at the end of this article to view it], every other country lines up on an almost straight line. There is a very stable relationship between how much money a country has in terms of GDP per capita, and how much it spends on health care.”
Thirty countries line up along the line. The U.S. doesn’t. One could easily argue that the…
2Nov2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | ContinuedAtlantiCare’s Baldrige Journey
It’s always interesting to read about the journeys taken by Baldrige Award winners. This month’s Quality Progress describes AtlantiCare’s nearly decade-long integration of the Baldrige model, which resulted in receiving the Award in 2009.
Like a lot of organizations, it used the state award process first, receiving a bronze award from Quality New Jersey in 2001. It first applied for the Baldrige Award in 2006 but did not get a site visit. That came in 2007, and again in 2008, before the site visit in 2009 led to the Award. In the article, AtlantiCare’s president and CEO, David Tilton, said, “You don’t know how much work you have to do, but we knew we were not Baldrige worthy when we had our first site visit. We knew we could be better.” (“Jersey Score,” Brett Krzykowski, Quality Progress, September 2010).
Organizations that are new to the Baldrige Criteria often struggle with identifying their strategic challenges. It’s been my experience that most healthcare organizations have very similar challenges. With that in mind, here are AtlantiCare’s:
- Engaging physicians in new models of collaboration and partnership.
- Creating sustainable growth outside of the primary service area.
- Identifying and prioritizing healthcare service opportunities for investment and recruitment.
- Developing new business and care models to support and grow primary care.
- Identifying and improving critical success factors for community health and wellness.
- Increasing quality of care through clinical communication and transparency.
- Using technology to improve patient safety and clinical quality.
- Recruiting, training, and retaining a highly skilled workforce.
- Succeeding in an environment of decreasing reimbursement and access to capital, and…
Catholic Healthcare Systems Excel
According to a Thomson Reuters study conducted for Modern Healthcare, Catholic-owned healthcare systems perform significantly better than investor-owned, for-profit systems.
The study used federally reported core quality measures along with inpatient mortality and complications rates, an inpatient safety index, 30-day mortality and readmission rates, average length of stay, and patients’ perceptions of care. A composite score across all of these measures was computed for 255 systems. The 36 Catholic systems had an average rank of 84 (lower is better), while “other church” systems came in at 121, secular not-for-profit systems scored 129, and investor-owned systems were at 182.
Eleven healthcare systems have won the Baldrige Award and all are not-for-profit. The first healthcare system to receive the Award, SSM, is a large Catholic system with 15 hospitals and two nursing homes in four states.
According to Jean Chenoweth at Thomson Reuters, “health systems owned by the Catholic Church may be the most active in setting and monitoring achievement of quality goals as well as aligning the management of hospitals within a system in achieving what they see as a mission.” That’s a good description of all 11 Baldrige healthcare winners.
You can read more about these winners by clicking on their profiles, which are two-page summaries of their organizations, or their award application summaries, which are their complete responses to the Baldrige Criteria questions:
- AtlantiCare (2009): Profile – Application Summary
- Heartland Health (2009): Profile – Application Summary
- Poudre Valley Health System (2008): Profile – Application Summary
- Mercy Health System (2007): Profile – Application Summary
- Sharp HealthCare (2007): Profile – Application Summary
- North Mississippi Medical Center (2006):…
A Healthcare Innovator
The Henry Ford Health System built its first new hospital since 1915 a couple years ago in West Bloomfield, 30 minutes from downtown Detroit. According to William C. Taylor, the hospital “truly must be seen to be believed.” (“One Hospital’s Radical Prescription for Change,” HBR, June 2, 2010)
Here are a few things that made Taylor a believer:
- The hospital sits on a wooded 160-acre campus
- All 300 rooms are private and designed so that family members can stay overnight if they wish
- All patients go right to pre-assigned rooms when they arrive
- A concierge helps patients and families with errands
- A “tea sommelier” recommends different teas for different situations
- There’s a day spa and an indoor farmer’s market every Wednesday
- There’s a 90-seat demonstration kitchen to teach patients’ families and the community how to prepare better food
- A celebrity chef spent two years creating 3,000 healthy recipes for patients to choose from
- The atrium features more than 2,000 trees lining paths to shops that sell products that can improve health
There’s a Baldrige connection to this story: West Bloomfield’s new CEO is Gerard van Grinsven, who joined Henry Ford after a long career with two-time Baldrige Award winner Ritz-Carlton. Skeptics questioned the wisdom of hiring someone with no healthcare experience to run the new hospital. Van Grinsven thinks it was a smart move. “I had a fresh pair of eyes and no baggage when I arrived,” he said. “The real opportunity for reinvention is to rethink the role of a hospital. How do we position ourselves as a community center for…
3Jun2010 | Steve George | 0 comments | Continued

